Unauthenticated firewall maintenance mode via undisclosed GlobalProtect flaw
Published Jan 15, 2026 · Updated Jan 15, 2026
Improper exceptional-condition handling in PAN-OS and Prisma Access allows remote attackers to interrupt firewall service. Palo Alto Networks has not disclosed which GlobalProtect gateway or portal operation mishandles the exceptional condition. Only configurations with an enabled GlobalProtect gateway or portal are exposed; repeated triggering forces the firewall into maintenance mode.
Summary
What happened
Improper exceptional-condition handling in PAN-OS and Prisma Access allows remote attackers to interrupt firewall service. Palo Alto Networks has not disclosed which GlobalProtect gateway or portal operation mishandles the exceptional condition. Only configurations with an enabled GlobalProtect gateway or portal are exposed; repeated triggering forces the firewall into maintenance mode.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2026-0227
- Published
- Jan 15, 2026
- Updated
- Jan 15, 2026
- Vendor
- Palo Alto Networks
- Product
- PAN-OS
- Classifications
- CWE-754, CAPEC-210, T1499.004
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Jan 15, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Jan 15, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=10.1.0 <10.1.14-h20 changes=[{"at":"10.1.14-h20","status":"unaffected"}]
- Affected versionversion=10.2.0 <10.2.18-h1, 10.2.16-h6, 10.2.13-h18, 10.2.10-h30, 10.2.7-h32 changes=[{"at":"10.2.18-h1","status":"unaffected"},{"at":"10.2.16-h6","status":"unaffected"},{"at":"10.2.13-h18","status":"unaffected"},{"at":"10.2.10-h30","status":"unaffected"},{"at":"10.2.7-h32","status":"unaffected"}]
- Affected versionversion=11.1.0 <11.1.13, 11.1.10-h9, 11.1.6-h23, 11.1.4-h27 changes=[{"at":"11.1.13","status":"unaffected"},{"at":"11.1.10-h9","status":"unaffected"},{"at":"11.1.6-h23","status":"unaffected"},{"at":"11.1.4-h27","status":"unaffected"}]
- Affected versionversion=11.2.0 <11.2.10-h2, 11.2.7-h8, 11.2.4-h15 changes=[{"at":"11.2.10-h2","status":"unaffected"},{"at":"11.2.7-h8","status":"unaffected"},{"at":"11.2.4-h15","status":"unaffected"}]
- Affected versionversion=12.1.0 <12.1.4, 12.1.3-h3 changes=[{"at":"12.1.4","status":"unaffected"},{"at":"12.1.3-h3","status":"unaffected"}]
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo