Spam-log deletion via forged administrator request
Published Sep 10, 2025 · Updated Apr 8, 2026
Cross-site request forgery in yonifre Maspik 2.5.6 and earlier allows remote attackers to delete all spam logs via a forged request. The clear_log handler performs the state-changing deletion without validating a WordPress nonce tied to the administrator's request. Exploitation requires a logged-in site administrator to follow or otherwise trigger an attacker-controlled request, and the bounded consequence is loss of the plugin's spam-log records.
Summary
What happened
Cross-site request forgery in yonifre Maspik 2.5.6 and earlier allows remote attackers to delete all spam logs via a forged request. The clear_log handler performs the state-changing deletion without validating a WordPress nonce tied to the administrator's request. Exploitation requires a logged-in site administrator to follow or otherwise trigger an attacker-controlled request, and the bounded consequence is loss of the plugin's spam-log records.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2025-9888
- Published
- Sep 10, 2025
- Updated
- Apr 8, 2026
- Vendor
- yonifre
- Product
- Maspik – Multi-Layer Spam Protection
- Classifications
- CWE-352, T1204.001
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Sep 10, 2025CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Apr 8, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=0 <=2.5.6
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo