Traffic interception via unenforced certificate validation
Published Sep 3, 2025 · Updated Feb 26, 2026
Improper certificate validation in PaperCut Print Deploy before 1.9.2917 allows man-in-the-middle attackers to intercept client traffic. The earlier setup guidance omitted the updater configuration needed to enforce certificate validation during client auto-updates. Exposure requires clients configured under that guidance with self-signed or private-CA certificates not correctly trusted by the operating system and Java trust stores.
Summary
What happened
Improper certificate validation in PaperCut Print Deploy before 1.9.2917 allows man-in-the-middle attackers to intercept client traffic. The earlier setup guidance omitted the updater configuration needed to enforce certificate validation during client auto-updates. Exposure requires clients configured under that guidance with self-signed or private-CA certificates not correctly trusted by the operating system and Java trust stores.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2025-9785
- Published
- Sep 3, 2025
- Updated
- Feb 26, 2026
- Vendor
- PaperCut
- Product
- Print Deploy
- Classifications
- CWE-295, CAPEC-94, T1557
- Attack vector
- adjacent
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Sep 3, 2025CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Feb 26, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=0 <1.9.2917 changes=[{"at":"1.9.2917","status":"unaffected"}]
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo