Typography settings modification via missing nonce validation
Published Oct 3, 2025 · Updated Oct 3, 2025
Cross-site request forgery in Samuel Jesse WP SinoType 1.0 and earlier allows remote attackers to alter typography via forged requests. The sinotype_config function processes state-changing submissions without correctly validating a WordPress nonce before saving typography options. Exploitation requires an administrator with an authenticated WordPress session to act on attacker-controlled content, and the reported consequence is limited to typography configuration changes.
Summary
What happened
Cross-site request forgery in Samuel Jesse WP SinoType 1.0 and earlier allows remote attackers to alter typography via forged requests. The sinotype_config function processes state-changing submissions without correctly validating a WordPress nonce before saving typography options. Exploitation requires an administrator with an authenticated WordPress session to act on attacker-controlled content, and the reported consequence is limited to typography configuration changes.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2025-9630
- Published
- Oct 3, 2025
- Updated
- Oct 3, 2025
- Vendor
- Samuel Jesse
- Product
- WP SinoType
- Classifications
- CWE-352, T1204.001
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Oct 3, 2025CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Oct 3, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=* <=1.0
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo