Authenticated device compromise via malformed management request
Published Jul 17, 2025 · Updated Jul 18, 2025
Stack-based buffer overflow in D-Link DI-8100 16.07.26A1 allows remote authenticated users to compromise the device via a crafted HTTP request. The HTTP handler processes attacker-controlled input to /menu_nat_more.asp without enforcing stack-buffer bounds, but published material does not identify the triggering parameter or copy operation. A valid low-privilege session is required; exploitation can interrupt service or corrupt execution, while reliable arbitrary code execution is not publicly established.
Summary
What happened
Stack-based buffer overflow in D-Link DI-8100 16.07.26A1 allows remote authenticated users to compromise the device via a crafted HTTP request. The HTTP handler processes attacker-controlled input to /menu_nat_more.asp without enforcing stack-buffer bounds, but published material does not identify the triggering parameter or copy operation. A valid low-privilege session is required; exploitation can interrupt service or corrupt execution, while reliable arbitrary code execution is not publicly established.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2025-7762
- Published
- Jul 17, 2025
- Updated
- Jul 18, 2025
- Vendor
- D-Link
- Product
- DI-8100
- Classifications
- CWE-121, CWE-119, T1190
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Jul 17, 2025CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Jul 18, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=16.07.26A1
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- XiDP0 menu_nat_more.asp proof of conceptproof of concept · unverified
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo