Unauthenticated command execution via SMTP recipient injection
Published Mar 24, 2026 · Updated Mar 24, 2026
Command injection in Zimbra Collaboration 8.8.15 allows remote attackers to execute system commands through crafted SMTP recipient input. The rejected CVE record duplicates CVE-2024-45519; PostJournal insufficiently sanitizes the RCPT TO value before shell processing, so expansion syntax becomes commands. Exploitation requires network access to SMTP and an enabled PostJournal service, and commands run in the Zimbra service context.
Summary
What happened
Command injection in Zimbra Collaboration 8.8.15 allows remote attackers to execute system commands through crafted SMTP recipient input. The rejected CVE record duplicates CVE-2024-45519; PostJournal insufficiently sanitizes the RCPT TO value before shell processing, so expansion syntax becomes commands. Exploitation requires network access to SMTP and an enabled PostJournal service, and commands run in the Zimbra service context.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2025-71275
- Published
- Mar 24, 2026
- Updated
- Mar 24, 2026
- Vendor
- Zimbra
- Product
- Zimbra Collaboration
- Classifications
- T1190, T1059.004
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Mar 24, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Mar 24, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=8.8.15
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
No CVSS assessment is available in this record.
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Public exploit references
- Chocapikk CVE-2024-45519 PostJournal exploitfunctional · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Reported exploitation
- CISA KEV listing for canonical duplicate CVE-2024-45519known exploited catalog
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo