System compromise via stale SLB preload entries
Published Jan 13, 2026 · Updated Jan 13, 2026
An SLB cache inconsistency in Linux Kernel allows local users to compromise affected PowerPC systems using the hash MMU. When switch_mm_irqs_off() skips switch_mmu_context() for identical mm_struct values, process migration can leave the hardware SLB out of sync with the software preload cache and reload a stale entry. Exploitation requires local low-privileged access, a 64-bit PowerPC hash-MMU system, process migration between CPUs, cache eviction, and a later SLB reload; the published impact covers system confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
Summary
What happened
An SLB cache inconsistency in Linux Kernel allows local users to compromise affected PowerPC systems using the hash MMU. When switch_mm_irqs_off() skips switch_mmu_context() for identical mm_struct values, process migration can leave the hardware SLB out of sync with the software preload cache and reload a stale entry. Exploitation requires local low-privileged access, a 64-bit PowerPC hash-MMU system, process migration between CPUs, cache eviction, and a later SLB reload; the published impact covers system confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2025-71078
- Published
- Jan 13, 2026
- Updated
- Jan 13, 2026
- Vendor
- The Linux Kernel Organization
- Product
- Linux Kernel
- Classifications
- T1068
- Attack vector
- local
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Jan 13, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Jan 13, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=4.20
- Affected versionversion=5434ae74629af58ad0fc27143a9ea435f7734410 <00312419f0863964625d6dcda8183f96849412c6
- Affected versionversion=5434ae74629af58ad0fc27143a9ea435f7734410 <4ae1e46d8a290319f33f71a2710a1382ba5431e8
- Affected versionversion=5434ae74629af58ad0fc27143a9ea435f7734410 <895123c309a34d2cfccf7812b41e17261a3a6f37
- Affected versionversion=5434ae74629af58ad0fc27143a9ea435f7734410 <b13a3dbfa196af68eae2031f209743735ad416bf
- Affected versionversion=5434ae74629af58ad0fc27143a9ea435f7734410 <c9f865022a1823d814032a09906e91e4701a35fc
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo