Service interruption via malformed PFCP association request
Published Feb 13, 2026 · Updated Feb 13, 2026
Improper input validation in free5GC 4.0.1 allows remote attackers to interrupt UPF service through malformed PFCP requests. The UPF accepts an Association Setup Request whose contained-item length exceeds its container, records a successful association, and enters an inconsistent state when a valid Session Establishment Request follows. Access to UDP port 8805 is sufficient to force the SMF into a reconnection loop and degrade core-network service.
Summary
What happened
Improper input validation in free5GC 4.0.1 allows remote attackers to interrupt UPF service through malformed PFCP requests. The UPF accepts an Association Setup Request whose contained-item length exceeds its container, records a successful association, and enters an inconsistent state when a valid Session Establishment Request follows. Access to UDP port 8805 is sufficient to force the SMF into a reconnection loop and degrade core-network service.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2025-70123
- Published
- Feb 13, 2026
- Updated
- Feb 13, 2026
- Vendor
- Unknown vendor
- Product
- Unknown product
- Classifications
- CWE-20, T1499.004
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Feb 13, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Feb 13, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Affected products and versions are unavailable in this record.
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- PFCP malformed association request reproducerproof of concept · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo