Remote code execution via workspaceRoots shell injection
Published Dec 30, 2025 · Updated Dec 30, 2025
Command injection in Serverless Framework 4.29.0 through 4.29.2 allows remote attackers to execute commands through the MCP server. The list-projects tool embeds each unvalidated workspaceRoots value in a quoted find command passed to child_process.exec, allowing shell syntax to escape the intended path argument. The experimental MCP feature must be running, the call requires userConfirmed, and internet exposure grants execution with server-process privileges.
Summary
What happened
Command injection in Serverless Framework 4.29.0 through 4.29.2 allows remote attackers to execute commands through the MCP server. The list-projects tool embeds each unvalidated workspaceRoots value in a quoted find command passed to child_process.exec, allowing shell syntax to escape the intended path argument. The experimental MCP feature must be running, the call requires userConfirmed, and internet exposure grants execution with server-process privileges.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2025-69256
- Published
- Dec 30, 2025
- Updated
- Dec 30, 2025
- Vendor
- Serverless, Inc.
- Product
- Serverless Framework
- Classifications
- CWE-77, T1059.004
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Dec 30, 2025CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Dec 30, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=>= 4.29.0, < 4.29.3
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- GHSA-rwc2-f344-q6w6 list-projects proof of conceptproof of concept · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo