JWT forgery via unchecked algorithm header
Published Jan 13, 2026 · Updated Jan 13, 2026
JWT algorithm confusion in Jervis before 2.2 allows remote attackers to forge tokens by supplying a non-RS256 JWT header. SecurityIO.verifyJsonWebToken tokenizes the input and calls RS256 signature verification without parsing the protected header or requiring its alg value to be RS256. The method is intended for GitHub JWTs, so token forgery affects external systems only when their callers rely on this verifier; the documented impact is integrity only.
Summary
What happened
JWT algorithm confusion in Jervis before 2.2 allows remote attackers to forge tokens by supplying a non-RS256 JWT header. SecurityIO.verifyJsonWebToken tokenizes the input and calls RS256 signature verification without parsing the protected header or requiring its alg value to be RS256. The method is intended for GitHub JWTs, so token forgery affects external systems only when their callers rely on this verifier; the documented impact is integrity only.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2025-68925
- Published
- Jan 13, 2026
- Updated
- Jan 13, 2026
- Vendor
- Sam Gleske
- Product
- Jervis
- Classifications
- CWE-347, T1550.001
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Jan 13, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Jan 13, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=< 2.2
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo