Unwanted actions via cross-site request forgery
Published Dec 24, 2025 · Updated Dec 24, 2025
Cross-site request forgery in Tikweb Fast User Switching 1.4.10 and earlier allows remote attackers to trigger unwanted actions. Neither the CNA record nor Patchstack identifies the affected endpoint, request parameters, or missing request-validation operation. Exploitation requires a privileged WordPress user with an active session to visit attacker-controlled content, and the published assessment limits the consequence to unauthorized state changes.
Summary
What happened
Cross-site request forgery in Tikweb Fast User Switching 1.4.10 and earlier allows remote attackers to trigger unwanted actions. Neither the CNA record nor Patchstack identifies the affected endpoint, request parameters, or missing request-validation operation. Exploitation requires a privileged WordPress user with an active session to visit attacker-controlled content, and the published assessment limits the consequence to unauthorized state changes.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2025-68583
- Published
- Dec 24, 2025
- Updated
- Dec 24, 2025
- Vendor
- Tikweb
- Product
- Fast User Switching
- Classifications
- CWE-352, CAPEC-62, T1204
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Dec 24, 2025CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Dec 24, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=n/a <=<= 1.4.10
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo