Authenticated event duplication via unbound copy nonce
Published Dec 24, 2025 · Updated Dec 24, 2025
Missing authorization in Spiffy Calendar 5.0.7 and earlier allows remote authenticated users to copy another user's event. The event-copy handler validates a nonce that is not bound to the requested event ID, so a token issued for one event is accepted when copying a different event. Contributor-level access and a valid copy nonce are required, and successful exploitation creates an unauthorized duplicate without broader reported impact.
Summary
What happened
Missing authorization in Spiffy Calendar 5.0.7 and earlier allows remote authenticated users to copy another user's event. The event-copy handler validates a nonce that is not bound to the requested event ID, so a token issued for one event is accepted when copying a different event. Contributor-level access and a valid copy nonce are required, and successful exploitation creates an unauthorized duplicate without broader reported impact.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2025-68523
- Published
- Dec 24, 2025
- Updated
- Dec 24, 2025
- Vendor
- Spiffy Plugins
- Product
- Spiffy Calendar
- Classifications
- CWE-862
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Dec 24, 2025CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Dec 24, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=n/a <=<= 5.0.7 changes=[{"at":"5.0.8","status":"unaffected"}]
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo