Account takeover via unescaped stored menu name
Published Dec 17, 2025 · Updated Dec 17, 2025
Stored cross-site scripting in ChurchCRM before 6.0.0 allows remote authenticated users to execute JavaScript in other users' browsers. The application persists the Name parameter during menu creation and later renders it without context-appropriate encoding or sufficient sanitization. High-privilege access is required to plant the payload, and a victim must view the affected menu; the script can act in the victim's session or steal a non-HttpOnly session cookie.
Summary
What happened
Stored cross-site scripting in ChurchCRM before 6.0.0 allows remote authenticated users to execute JavaScript in other users' browsers. The application persists the Name parameter during menu creation and later renders it without context-appropriate encoding or sufficient sanitization. High-privilege access is required to plant the payload, and a victim must view the affected menu; the script can act in the victim's session or steal a non-HttpOnly session cookie.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2025-68401
- Published
- Dec 17, 2025
- Updated
- Dec 17, 2025
- Vendor
- ChurchCRM
- Product
- ChurchCRM
- Classifications
- CWE-79, T1539
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- admin
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Dec 17, 2025CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Dec 17, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=< 6.0.0
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- GHSA-phfw-p278-qq7v stored-XSS proof of conceptproof of concept · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo