Service disruption via allocation-warning log amplification
Published Dec 16, 2025 · Updated Dec 16, 2025
Resource exhaustion in Linux allows remote attackers to disrupt service through sustained traffic to a page-pool network interface. The page_pool allocator performs GFP_ATOMIC receive-path allocations without __GFP_NOWARN, so repeated failures emit expensive stack and memory-state dumps. An unauthenticated peer can reach affected receive paths before firewall or protocol authentication; sustained failures can monopolize logging or fill constrained log storage.
Summary
What happened
Resource exhaustion in Linux allows remote attackers to disrupt service through sustained traffic to a page-pool network interface. The page_pool allocator performs GFP_ATOMIC receive-path allocations without __GFP_NOWARN, so repeated failures emit expensive stack and memory-state dumps. An unauthenticated peer can reach affected receive paths before firewall or protocol authentication; sustained failures can monopolize logging or fill constrained log storage.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2025-68321
- Published
- Dec 16, 2025
- Updated
- Dec 16, 2025
- Vendor
- The Linux Kernel Organization
- Product
- Linux
- Classifications
- CWE-390, T1499.002
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Dec 16, 2025CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Dec 16, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 <0ec2cd5c58793d0c622797cd5fbe26634b357210
- Affected versionversion=1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 <3671a0775952026228ae44e096eb144bca75f8dc
- Affected versionversion=1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 <7613c06ffa89c1e2266fb532e23ef7dfdf269d73
- Affected versionversion=1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 <9835a0fd59a1df5ec0740fdab6d50db68e0f10de
- Affected versionversion=1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 <ab48dc0e23eb714b3f233f8e8f6deed7df2051f5
- Affected versionversion=1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 <f3b52167a0cb23b27414452fbc1278da2ee884fc
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo