Kernel warning via incorrect MPTCP fallback operations
Published Dec 16, 2025 · Updated Dec 16, 2025
Improper protocol fallback in affected Linux kernel releases beginning with 5.7 allows local users to trigger a kernel warning through BPF sockmap use. In net/mptcp/protocol.c, mptcp_fallback_tcp_ops() compares mutable sk_prot state to choose native socket operations after sockmap has replaced that state, so it can assign the wrong sk_socket operations. The path requires server-side MPTCP, a non-MPTCP client SYN, BPF sockmap replacement, and subsequent accept processing; the documented consequence is a warning and incorrect socket operations.
Summary
What happened
Improper protocol fallback in affected Linux kernel releases beginning with 5.7 allows local users to trigger a kernel warning through BPF sockmap use. In net/mptcp/protocol.c, mptcp_fallback_tcp_ops() compares mutable sk_prot state to choose native socket operations after sockmap has replaced that state, so it can assign the wrong sk_socket operations. The path requires server-side MPTCP, a non-MPTCP client SYN, BPF sockmap replacement, and subsequent accept processing; the documented consequence is a warning and incorrect socket operations.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2025-68227
- Published
- Dec 16, 2025
- Updated
- Dec 16, 2025
- Vendor
- The Linux Kernel Organization
- Product
- Linux
- Classifications
- Unavailable
- Attack vector
- local
- Privileges
- Unavailable
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Dec 16, 2025CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Dec 16, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=0b4f33def7bbde1ce2fea05f116639270e7acdc7 <037cc50589643342d69185b663ecf9d26cce91e8
- Affected versionversion=0b4f33def7bbde1ce2fea05f116639270e7acdc7 <1a0d5c74af9b6ba9ffdf1172de5a1a6df5922a00
- Affected versionversion=0b4f33def7bbde1ce2fea05f116639270e7acdc7 <344974ea1a3ca30e4920687b0091bda4438cebdb
- Affected versionversion=0b4f33def7bbde1ce2fea05f116639270e7acdc7 <7ee8f015eb47907745e2070184a8ab1e442ac3c4
- Affected versionversion=0b4f33def7bbde1ce2fea05f116639270e7acdc7 <92c4092fe012ecdfa5fb05d394f1c1d8f91ad81c
- Affected versionversion=0b4f33def7bbde1ce2fea05f116639270e7acdc7 <9b1980b6f23fa30bf12add19f37c7458625099eb
- Affected versionversion=0b4f33def7bbde1ce2fea05f116639270e7acdc7 <c77b3b79a92e3345aa1ee296180d1af4e7031f8f
- Affected versionversion=5.7
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
No CVSS assessment is available in this record.
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
No sourced classifications are available.
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo