Kernel denial of service via cached-directory use-after-free
Published Dec 16, 2025 · Updated Dec 16, 2025
Use-after-free in the Linux SMB client 6.17.8 through 6.17.9 allows remote attackers to interrupt the kernel through SMB activity. cfids_invalidation_worker() directly calls kref_put() on a cached-directory reference instead of close_cached_dir(), permitting later work to access the freed object. Reachability requires the SMB client path and interaction with an SMB share; successful exploitation destabilizes or crashes the host kernel.
Summary
What happened
Use-after-free in the Linux SMB client 6.17.8 through 6.17.9 allows remote attackers to interrupt the kernel through SMB activity. cfids_invalidation_worker() directly calls kref_put() on a cached-directory reference instead of close_cached_dir(), permitting later work to access the freed object. Reachability requires the SMB client path and interaction with an SMB share; successful exploitation destabilizes or crashes the host kernel.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2025-68226
- Published
- Dec 16, 2025
- Updated
- Dec 16, 2025
- Vendor
- The Linux Kernel Organization
- Product
- Linux
- Classifications
- CWE-911, T1499
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Dec 16, 2025CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Dec 16, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=6.17.8 <6.17.10
- Affected versionversion=bdb596ceb4b7c3f28786a33840263728217fbcf5 <abd29b6e17a918fdd68352ce4813e167acc8727e
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo