Unauthenticated server requests via attacker-chosen destinations
Published Dec 16, 2025 · Updated Dec 16, 2025
Server-side request forgery in LMPixels Kerge 4.1.3 and earlier allows remote attackers to make the WordPress server send arbitrary requests. Patchstack has not disclosed the vulnerable function, request parameter, or missing validation that permits attacker-selected destinations. No authentication or user interaction is required; requests run from the server context and can reach internal services or external hosts.
Summary
What happened
Server-side request forgery in LMPixels Kerge 4.1.3 and earlier allows remote attackers to make the WordPress server send arbitrary requests. Patchstack has not disclosed the vulnerable function, request parameter, or missing validation that permits attacker-selected destinations. No authentication or user interaction is required; requests run from the server context and can reach internal services or external hosts.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2025-67989
- Published
- Dec 16, 2025
- Updated
- Dec 16, 2025
- Vendor
- LMPixels
- Product
- Kerge
- Classifications
- CWE-918, CAPEC-664, T1090
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Dec 16, 2025CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Dec 16, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=n/a <=<= 4.1.3 changes=[{"at":"4.1.4","status":"unaffected"}]
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo