Authenticated internal-service access via server-side requests
Published Jan 22, 2026 · Updated Jan 22, 2026
Server-side request forgery in WPO365 | LOGIN 40.0 and earlier allows remote authenticated users to reach arbitrary internal services. Neither the CNA record nor the vendor changelog identifies the request handler, parameter, or missing validation that enables the server-side request. Subscriber-level access is required, and successful exploitation lets the WordPress host query or modify information exposed by internal services.
Summary
What happened
Server-side request forgery in WPO365 | LOGIN 40.0 and earlier allows remote authenticated users to reach arbitrary internal services. Neither the CNA record nor the vendor changelog identifies the request handler, parameter, or missing validation that enables the server-side request. Subscriber-level access is required, and successful exploitation lets the WordPress host query or modify information exposed by internal services.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2025-67961
- Published
- Jan 22, 2026
- Updated
- Jan 22, 2026
- Vendor
- WPO365
- Product
- WPO365 | LOGIN
- Classifications
- CWE-918, CAPEC-664, T1090.001
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Jan 22, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Jan 22, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=n/a <=<= 40.0 changes=[{"at":"40.1","status":"unaffected"}]
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- Atomic Edge PHP proof of conceptproof of concept · unverified
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo