Cross-tenant XSS via unscoped static asset routing
Published Dec 19, 2025 · Updated Dec 19, 2025
Cross-site scripting in Mintlify Platform before 2025-11-15 allows remote authenticated users to execute script on another tenant's domain. The /_mintlify/static/[subdomain] route trusted its subdomain parameter, so it returned an attacker's uploaded script-bearing SVG under a victim documentation origin. Exploitation requires control of a Mintlify tenant and a victim opening the crafted asset URL; credentials are exposed when custom documentation origins share broadly scoped cookies or local storage.
Summary
What happened
Cross-site scripting in Mintlify Platform before 2025-11-15 allows remote authenticated users to execute script on another tenant's domain. The /_mintlify/static/[subdomain] route trusted its subdomain parameter, so it returned an attacker's uploaded script-bearing SVG under a victim documentation origin. Exploitation requires control of a Mintlify tenant and a victim opening the crafted asset URL; credentials are exposed when custom documentation origins share broadly scoped cookies or local storage.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2025-67842
- Published
- Dec 19, 2025
- Updated
- Dec 19, 2025
- Vendor
- Mintlify
- Product
- Mintlify Platform
- Classifications
- CWE-829, T1189
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Dec 19, 2025CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Dec 19, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=0 <2025-11-15
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- Cross-tenant script-bearing SVG proof of conceptfunctional · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo