Reserved data-attribute injection via magic word expansion
Published Feb 3, 2026 · Updated Feb 3, 2026
Input validation bypass in MediaWiki and Cite before 1.39.14, 1.43.4, and 1.44.1 allows remote attackers to inject reserved data attributes. The legacy parser expands underscore magic-word syntax after Sanitizer.php validates data-* names, allowing a rejected name to become a reserved attribute. Exploitation requires attacker-controlled wikitext to reach the legacy parser; the vendor documents no direct confidentiality, integrity, or availability impact.
Summary
What happened
Input validation bypass in MediaWiki and Cite before 1.39.14, 1.43.4, and 1.44.1 allows remote attackers to inject reserved data attributes. The legacy parser expands underscore magic-word syntax after Sanitizer.php validates data-* names, allowing a rejected name to become a reserved attribute. Exploitation requires attacker-controlled wikitext to reach the legacy parser; the vendor documents no direct confidentiality, integrity, or availability impact.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2025-67479
- Published
- Feb 3, 2026
- Updated
- Feb 3, 2026
- Vendor
- Wikimedia Foundation
- Product
- MediaWiki
- Classifications
- Unavailable
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Feb 3, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Feb 3, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=* <1.39.14, 1.43.4, 1.44.1
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
No sourced classifications are available.
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo