Signature forgery via raw-hash presignature misuse
Published Nov 25, 2025 · Updated Nov 25, 2025
Cryptographic weakness in cggmp21 0.6.3 and earlier and cggmp24 0.7.0-alpha.1 allows remote attackers to forge ECDSA signatures. Presignature::issue_partial_signature accepts an attacker-chosen digest without requiring the original message, while set_derivation_path applies a chosen HD path to a presignature. Exploitation requires raw-hash signing or post-presignature HD derivation; the former enables forgery and the latter lowers security to 85 bits.
Summary
What happened
Cryptographic weakness in cggmp21 0.6.3 and earlier and cggmp24 0.7.0-alpha.1 allows remote attackers to forge ECDSA signatures. Presignature::issue_partial_signature accepts an attacker-chosen digest without requiring the original message, while set_derivation_path applies a chosen HD path to a presignature. Exploitation requires raw-hash signing or post-presignature HD derivation; the former enables forgery and the latter lowers security to 85 bits.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2025-66017
- Published
- Nov 25, 2025
- Updated
- Nov 25, 2025
- Vendor
- Lockness
- Product
- cggmp21
- Classifications
- CWE-327, T1565
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Nov 25, 2025CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Nov 25, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=cggmp21 <= 0.6.3
- Affected versionversion=cggmp24 = 0.7.0-alpha.1
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo