Build-time command execution via predictable temporary file
Published Dec 9, 2025 · Updated Jul 5, 2026
Insecure temporary-file handling in OpenMPTCProuter 0.64 and earlier allows local users to execute commands during RUTX image builds. create_xor_ipad_opad calls mktemp, then opens the predictable path without exclusive creation, allowing a symlink swap before the write. Reachability requires control of the build environment or working directory; deployed firmware does not contain the affected build-time code.
Summary
What happened
Insecure temporary-file handling in OpenMPTCProuter 0.64 and earlier allows local users to execute commands during RUTX image builds. create_xor_ipad_opad calls mktemp, then opens the predictable path without exclusive creation, allowing a symlink swap before the write. Reachability requires control of the build environment or working directory; deployed firmware does not contain the affected build-time code.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2025-65882
- Published
- Dec 9, 2025
- Updated
- Jul 5, 2026
- Vendor
- Unknown vendor
- Product
- Unknown product
- Classifications
- CWE-377, CWE-78, T1059.004
- Attack vector
- local
- Privileges
- Unavailable
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Dec 9, 2025CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Jul 5, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Affected products and versions are unavailable in this record.
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- OpenMPTCProuter RUTX build vulnerability technical proof of conceptproof of concept · unverified
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo