Code execution via PDF-directed pickle deserialization
Published Nov 10, 2025 · Updated Nov 10, 2025
Unsafe deserialization in pdfminer.six before 20251107 allows attackers to execute code by supplying a crafted PDF and pickle file. CMapDB._load_data() accepts a PDF-controlled CMap name, resolves it outside the bundled cmap directory, and passes the referenced gzip data to pickle.loads(). Processing the PDF is required; Linux and macOS also require the pickle at a known local path, while Windows can retrieve it from an attacker-controlled network location.
Summary
What happened
Unsafe deserialization in pdfminer.six before 20251107 allows attackers to execute code by supplying a crafted PDF and pickle file. CMapDB._load_data() accepts a PDF-controlled CMap name, resolves it outside the bundled cmap directory, and passes the referenced gzip data to pickle.loads(). Processing the PDF is required; Linux and macOS also require the pickle at a known local path, while Windows can retrieve it from an attacker-controlled network location.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2025-64512
- Published
- Nov 10, 2025
- Updated
- Nov 10, 2025
- Vendor
- pdfminer
- Product
- pdfminer.six
- Classifications
- CWE-502, T1204.002
- Attack vector
- local
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Nov 10, 2025CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Nov 10, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=< 20251107
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- GitHub advisory crafted-PDF proof of conceptproof of concept · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo