Terminal output spoofing via unsanitized stored fields
Published Nov 8, 2025 · Updated Nov 8, 2025
Control-sequence injection in Charmbracelet Soft Serve 0.10.0 and earlier allows remote authenticated users to spoof terminal output. The SSH commands render unsanitized repository descriptions, project names, commit authors and messages, token names, and webhook URLs as terminal text. A low-privileged user must first store crafted ANSI sequences and another user must view affected output; resulting terminal content can display false alerts or conceal genuine text.
Summary
What happened
Control-sequence injection in Charmbracelet Soft Serve 0.10.0 and earlier allows remote authenticated users to spoof terminal output. The SSH commands render unsanitized repository descriptions, project names, commit authors and messages, token names, and webhook URLs as terminal text. A low-privileged user must first store crafted ANSI sequences and another user must view affected output; resulting terminal content can display false alerts or conceal genuine text.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2025-64494
- Published
- Nov 8, 2025
- Updated
- Nov 8, 2025
- Vendor
- Charmbracelet
- Product
- Soft Serve
- Classifications
- CWE-150, T1036
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Nov 8, 2025CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Nov 8, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=<= 0.10.0
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo