RBAC bypass via unchecked client certificate CN
Published Nov 7, 2025 · Updated Nov 7, 2025
Authentication bypass in KubeVirt before 1.5.3 and 1.6.0 allows local users to bypass RBAC controls via crafted mTLS requests. The virt-api SetupTLSWithCertManager path accepts certificates signed by the client CA without comparing their Common Name with the extension-apiserver-authentication allowlist. Exploitation requires a compromised pod and a stolen authentication-proxy certificate, enabling forged aggregator identity headers to reset or freeze virtual machines or remove their volumes.
Summary
What happened
Authentication bypass in KubeVirt before 1.5.3 and 1.6.0 allows local users to bypass RBAC controls via crafted mTLS requests. The virt-api SetupTLSWithCertManager path accepts certificates signed by the client CA without comparing their Common Name with the extension-apiserver-authentication allowlist. Exploitation requires a compromised pod and a stolen authentication-proxy certificate, enabling forged aggregator identity headers to reset or freeze virtual machines or remove their volumes.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2025-64432
- Published
- Nov 7, 2025
- Updated
- Nov 7, 2025
- Vendor
- KubeVirt
- Product
- KubeVirt
- Classifications
- CWE-295, CWE-287, T1068
- Attack vector
- local
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Nov 7, 2025CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Nov 7, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=< 1.5.3
- Affected versionversion=>= 1.6.0, < 1.6.1
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- Vendor advisory proof of conceptproof of concept · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo