Subscriber-level unauthorized action via missing capability check
Published Dec 18, 2025 · Updated Dec 18, 2025
Missing authorization in GetResponse Official 1.5.3 and earlier allows remote authenticated users to perform an unauthorized action. A plugin function performs the action without a WordPress capability check, but published sources do not identify the function or affected state. Subscriber-level WordPress access is sufficient; the established consequence is unauthorized modification without disclosure of the exact operation.
Summary
What happened
Missing authorization in GetResponse Official 1.5.3 and earlier allows remote authenticated users to perform an unauthorized action. A plugin function performs the action without a WordPress capability check, but published sources do not identify the function or affected state. Subscriber-level WordPress access is sufficient; the established consequence is unauthorized modification without disclosure of the exact operation.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2025-64273
- Published
- Dec 18, 2025
- Updated
- Dec 18, 2025
- Vendor
- GetResponse
- Product
- GetResponse Official
- Classifications
- CWE-862, CAPEC-180
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Dec 18, 2025CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Dec 18, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=n/a <=<= 1.5.3 changes=[{"at":"1.5.4","status":"unaffected"}]
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo