Remote code execution via unsafe pickle deserialization
Published Nov 25, 2025 · Updated Nov 26, 2025
Unsafe deserialization in Fugue 0.9.2 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code through a network-bound RPC server. The _decode() function in fugue/rpc/flask.py passes client-supplied serialized objects directly to cloudpickle.loads(), which reconstructs attacker-controlled Python objects. Exploitation requires FlaskRPCServer to bind to a reachable network interface; successful requests run code with the server process's privileges.
Summary
What happened
Unsafe deserialization in Fugue 0.9.2 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code through a network-bound RPC server. The _decode() function in fugue/rpc/flask.py passes client-supplied serialized objects directly to cloudpickle.loads(), which reconstructs attacker-controlled Python objects. Exploitation requires FlaskRPCServer to bind to a reachable network interface; successful requests run code with the server process's privileges.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2025-62703
- Published
- Nov 25, 2025
- Updated
- Nov 26, 2025
- Vendor
- The Fugue Project
- Product
- Fugue
- Classifications
- CWE-502, T1190
- Attack vector
- adjacent
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Nov 25, 2025CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Nov 26, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=<= 0.9.2
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- FlaskRPCServer crafted-pickle proof of conceptproof of concept · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo