Privileged actions via forged administrator requests
Published Dec 31, 2025 · Updated Dec 31, 2025
Cross-site request forgery in Rick Beckman OpenHook 4.3.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to trigger unwanted privileged actions. Patchstack has not disclosed the affected request handler or which anti-CSRF validation operation is missing or incorrect. Exploitation requires a privileged WordPress user with an active session to follow a malicious link, visit a crafted page, or submit a form; the affected action and exact resulting change or interruption are undisclosed.
Summary
What happened
Cross-site request forgery in Rick Beckman OpenHook 4.3.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to trigger unwanted privileged actions. Patchstack has not disclosed the affected request handler or which anti-CSRF validation operation is missing or incorrect. Exploitation requires a privileged WordPress user with an active session to follow a malicious link, visit a crafted page, or submit a form; the affected action and exact resulting change or interruption are undisclosed.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2025-62120
- Published
- Dec 31, 2025
- Updated
- Dec 31, 2025
- Vendor
- Rick Beckman
- Product
- OpenHook
- Classifications
- CWE-352, CAPEC-62, T1566.002
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Dec 31, 2025CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Dec 31, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=n/a <=4.3.1
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo