Service interruption via uncleared failed-handshake memory
Published Oct 15, 2025 · Updated Oct 15, 2025
Memory leak in F5 BIG-IP products allows remote attackers to exhaust TMM memory with crafted TLS requests to configured virtual servers. After an SSL handshake failure, TMM does not clear allocated memory, so repeated undisclosed requests accumulate memory when a client SSL profile is attached. The request path is unauthenticated and network-reachable, but exposure requires a virtual server with a client SSL profile; sustained traffic can interrupt service without reading or modifying data.
Summary
What happened
Memory leak in F5 BIG-IP products allows remote attackers to exhaust TMM memory with crafted TLS requests to configured virtual servers. After an SSL handshake failure, TMM does not clear allocated memory, so repeated undisclosed requests accumulate memory when a client SSL profile is attached. The request path is unauthenticated and network-reachable, but exposure requires a virtual server with a client SSL profile; sustained traffic can interrupt service without reading or modifying data.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2025-61974
- Published
- Oct 15, 2025
- Updated
- Oct 15, 2025
- Vendor
- F5 Networks
- Product
- BIG-IP Next for Kubernetes
- Classifications
- CWE-401, T1499.004
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Oct 15, 2025CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Oct 15, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=2.0.0 <* changes=[{"at":"2.1.0-EHF-1","status":"unaffected"}]
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo