Unauthenticated HTTP request splitting via CRLF injection
Published Jul 29, 2025 · Updated Jun 5, 2026
CRLF injection in DECE Software GEODI before GEODI Setup 9.0.146 allows remote attackers to split HTTP requests via crafted input. The published advisory does not identify the affected endpoint or the operation that fails to neutralize attacker-supplied carriage-return and line-feed sequences. No authentication or user interaction is required; successful exploitation can desynchronize HTTP message boundaries and alter downstream request handling.
Summary
What happened
CRLF injection in DECE Software GEODI before GEODI Setup 9.0.146 allows remote attackers to split HTTP requests via crafted input. The published advisory does not identify the affected endpoint or the operation that fails to neutralize attacker-supplied carriage-return and line-feed sequences. No authentication or user interaction is required; successful exploitation can desynchronize HTTP message boundaries and alter downstream request handling.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2025-6175
- Published
- Jul 29, 2025
- Updated
- Jun 5, 2026
- Vendor
- DECE Software
- Product
- GEODI
- Classifications
- CWE-93, CAPEC-105, T1190
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Jul 29, 2025CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Jun 5, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=0 <GEODI Setup 9.0.146
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo