Reflected XSS via forged privileged-user requests
Published Oct 29, 2025 · Updated Oct 29, 2025
Cross-site request forgery in Allegro Marketing hpb seo plugin for WordPress 3.0.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to trigger reflected XSS. Patchstack has not disclosed the affected endpoint, parameter, or code path, so the operation that reflects untrusted input remains unknown. Exploitation requires a privileged user to follow a malicious link, visit a crafted page, or submit a form, causing attacker-supplied script to run in that user's browser context.
Summary
What happened
Cross-site request forgery in Allegro Marketing hpb seo plugin for WordPress 3.0.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to trigger reflected XSS. Patchstack has not disclosed the affected endpoint, parameter, or code path, so the operation that reflects untrusted input remains unknown. Exploitation requires a privileged user to follow a malicious link, visit a crafted page, or submit a form, causing attacker-supplied script to run in that user's browser context.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2025-60075
- Published
- Oct 29, 2025
- Updated
- Oct 29, 2025
- Vendor
- Allegro Marketing
- Product
- hpb seo plugin for WordPress
- Classifications
- CWE-352, CAPEC-591, T1203
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Oct 29, 2025CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Oct 29, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=n/a <=<= 3.0.1
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo