Arbitrary code execution via negative TGA pixel count
Published Nov 26, 2025 · Updated Dec 6, 2025
Heap-based buffer overflow in KDE Krita before 5.2.13 allows remote attackers to execute code after a user opens a crafted TGA file. KisTgaImport continues parsing when the calculated pixel count is negative, then copies user-supplied data without validating its length against the heap buffer. Exploitation requires a user to open the file; successful execution runs with the privileges of the Krita process, while malformed input can instead crash the application.
Summary
What happened
Heap-based buffer overflow in KDE Krita before 5.2.13 allows remote attackers to execute code after a user opens a crafted TGA file. KisTgaImport continues parsing when the calculated pixel count is negative, then copies user-supplied data without validating its length against the heap buffer. Exploitation requires a user to open the file; successful execution runs with the privileges of the Krita process, while malformed input can instead crash the application.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2025-59820
- Published
- Nov 26, 2025
- Updated
- Dec 6, 2025
- Vendor
- KDE
- Product
- Krita
- Classifications
- CWE-1284, T1204.002
- Attack vector
- local
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Nov 26, 2025CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Dec 6, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=0 <5.2.13
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo