Audit-record tampering via omitted GPG signing
Published Sep 17, 2025 · Updated Sep 17, 2025
Missing signing in OVHcloud The Bastion before 3.22.00 allows local users with high privileges to tamper with encrypted ttyrec recordings. The osh-encrypt-rsync gpg_encrypt routine supplies the signing key and passphrase but omits GPG's --sign option, so encrypted output lacks a verifiable signature. If the optional signing workflow is configured, a user able to modify recordings and access the public encryption keys can alter audit evidence without easy detection.
Summary
What happened
Missing signing in OVHcloud The Bastion before 3.22.00 allows local users with high privileges to tamper with encrypted ttyrec recordings. The osh-encrypt-rsync gpg_encrypt routine supplies the signing key and passphrase but omits GPG's --sign option, so encrypted output lacks a verifiable signature. If the optional signing workflow is configured, a user able to modify recordings and access the public encryption keys can alter audit evidence without easy detection.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2025-59339
- Published
- Sep 17, 2025
- Updated
- Sep 17, 2025
- Vendor
- OVHcloud
- Product
- The Bastion
- Classifications
- CWE-325, T1565.001
- Attack vector
- local
- Privileges
- admin
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Sep 17, 2025CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Sep 17, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=< 3.22.00
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo