Scan database disclosure via unchecked SSE headers
Published Sep 29, 2025 · Updated Sep 29, 2025
DNS rebinding in SafeDep Vet before 1.12.5 allows remote attackers to read scan database data through the SSE MCP server. The SSE transport accepts browser requests without validating the HTTP Host or Origin header, letting a rebound domain reach the loopback listener and invoke the sqlite3 query tool. Exploitation requires an SSE-mode MCP server on its default port with access to a saved scan database and active interaction by a user lured to an attacker-controlled site.
Summary
What happened
DNS rebinding in SafeDep Vet before 1.12.5 allows remote attackers to read scan database data through the SSE MCP server. The SSE transport accepts browser requests without validating the HTTP Host or Origin header, letting a rebound domain reach the loopback listener and invoke the sqlite3 query tool. Exploitation requires an SSE-mode MCP server on its default port with access to a saved scan database and active interaction by a user lured to an attacker-controlled site.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2025-59163
- Published
- Sep 29, 2025
- Updated
- Sep 29, 2025
- Vendor
- SafeDep
- Product
- Vet
- Classifications
- CWE-350, T1189
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Sep 29, 2025CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Sep 29, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=< 1.12.5
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo