Remote service crash via NULL SAN dereference
Published Oct 1, 2025 · Updated Oct 23, 2025
NULL pointer dereference in Open Information Security Foundation Suricata 8.0.0 allows remote attackers to crash via a crafted TLS certificate. While evaluating tls.subjectaltname rules, TlsSubjectAltNameGetData passes a NULL decoded SAN entry to strlen instead of treating its length as zero. Exploitation requires an enabled rule using that keyword and traffic containing a certificate with a NUL byte, causing a segmentation fault and service interruption.
Summary
What happened
NULL pointer dereference in Open Information Security Foundation Suricata 8.0.0 allows remote attackers to crash via a crafted TLS certificate. While evaluating tls.subjectaltname rules, TlsSubjectAltNameGetData passes a NULL decoded SAN entry to strlen instead of treating its length as zero. Exploitation requires an enabled rule using that keyword and traffic containing a certificate with a NUL byte, causing a segmentation fault and service interruption.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2025-59150
- Published
- Oct 1, 2025
- Updated
- Oct 23, 2025
- Vendor
- Open Information Security Foundation
- Product
- Suricata
- Classifications
- CWE-476, T1499.004
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Oct 1, 2025CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Oct 23, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=>= 8.0.0, < 8.0.1
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo