Guest-secret disclosure via unauthenticated LUKS2 metadata
Published Sep 12, 2025 · Updated Sep 12, 2025
Improper LUKS2 volume validation in Dstack TEE dstack before 0.5.4 allows attackers to disclose guest secrets via a crafted data disk. The resume path accepts unauthenticated LUKS2 metadata, opens null-cipher keyslots or volumes without error, and writes secrets under an attacker-controlled key. Control of the host-provided data device is required; exploitation exposes WireGuard keys and permits attacker-chosen persistent data to influence guest execution.
Summary
What happened
Improper LUKS2 volume validation in Dstack TEE dstack before 0.5.4 allows attackers to disclose guest secrets via a crafted data disk. The resume path accepts unauthenticated LUKS2 metadata, opens null-cipher keyslots or volumes without error, and writes secrets under an attacker-controlled key. Control of the host-provided data device is required; exploitation exposes WireGuard keys and permits attacker-chosen persistent data to influence guest execution.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2025-59054
- Published
- Sep 12, 2025
- Updated
- Sep 12, 2025
- Vendor
- Dstack TEE
- Product
- dstack
- Classifications
- CWE-552, T1565.001
- Attack vector
- local
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Sep 12, 2025CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Sep 12, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=< 0.5.4
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo