Stored XSS via missing request-forgery protection
Published Sep 5, 2025 · Updated May 12, 2026
Cross-site request forgery in KaizenCoders Enable Latex 1.2.16 and earlier allows remote attackers to store script content in WordPress. The public advisory identifies missing request-forgery protection on an unspecified function but does not disclose the function or affected parameter. Exploitation requires a logged-in privileged user to open a crafted link or page or submit a forged form, after which stored script executes in visitors' browsers.
Summary
What happened
Cross-site request forgery in KaizenCoders Enable Latex 1.2.16 and earlier allows remote attackers to store script content in WordPress. The public advisory identifies missing request-forgery protection on an unspecified function but does not disclose the function or affected parameter. Exploitation requires a logged-in privileged user to open a crafted link or page or submit a forged form, after which stored script executes in visitors' browsers.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2025-58860
- Published
- Sep 5, 2025
- Updated
- May 12, 2026
- Vendor
- KaizenCoders
- Product
- Enable Latex
- Classifications
- CWE-352, CAPEC-592, T1203
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Sep 5, 2025CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- May 12, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=0 <=1.2.16
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo