Unauthenticated code execution via oversized SSO token
Published Sep 9, 2025 · Updated Sep 10, 2025
Heap-based buffer overflow in the rAthena login server before commit 2f5248b allows remote attackers to crash it or execute code. logclif_parse_reqauth_sso derives a safestrncpy length from the declared CA_SSO_LOGIN_REQ packet length instead of the 33-byte destination, overwriting adjacent login_session_data fields. The login service accepts the dynamic-size packet before authentication, so network access to it is sufficient for a service crash or heap-corruption code execution.
Summary
What happened
Heap-based buffer overflow in the rAthena login server before commit 2f5248b allows remote attackers to crash it or execute code. logclif_parse_reqauth_sso derives a safestrncpy length from the declared CA_SSO_LOGIN_REQ packet length instead of the 33-byte destination, overwriting adjacent login_session_data fields. The login service accepts the dynamic-size packet before authentication, so network access to it is sufficient for a service crash or heap-corruption code execution.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2025-58447
- Published
- Sep 9, 2025
- Updated
- Sep 10, 2025
- Vendor
- rAthena
- Product
- rAthena
- Classifications
- CWE-122, CWE-787, T1190
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Sep 9, 2025CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Sep 10, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=< 2f5248b
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo