Request smuggling via incomplete header character validation
Published Aug 25, 2025 · Updated Nov 3, 2025
HTTP request splitting in python-hyper h2 before 4.3.0 allows remote attackers to smuggle requests across HTTP/2-to-HTTP/1.1 gateways. The validate_headers path in src/h2/utilities.py rejected only CR, LF, and NUL, leaving other RFC-illegal header-name bytes and embedded colons accepted. Exploitation requires an embedding server or proxy to downgrade and serialize the accepted HTTP/2 headers as HTTP/1.1, where ambiguous syntax can alter request boundaries and bypass downstream controls.
Summary
What happened
HTTP request splitting in python-hyper h2 before 4.3.0 allows remote attackers to smuggle requests across HTTP/2-to-HTTP/1.1 gateways. The validate_headers path in src/h2/utilities.py rejected only CR, LF, and NUL, leaving other RFC-illegal header-name bytes and embedded colons accepted. Exploitation requires an embedding server or proxy to downgrade and serialize the accepted HTTP/2 headers as HTTP/1.1, where ambiguous syntax can alter request boundaries and bypass downstream controls.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2025-57804
- Published
- Aug 25, 2025
- Updated
- Nov 3, 2025
- Vendor
- python-hyper
- Product
- h2
- Classifications
- CWE-93, T1190
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Aug 25, 2025CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Nov 3, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=< 4.3.0
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo