Code execution via untrusted pickle deserialization
Published Jan 20, 2026 · Updated Jan 20, 2026
Unsafe deserialization in PLY (Python Lex-Yacc) 3.11 allows context-dependent attackers to execute code through a crafted pickle file. LRTable.read_pickle() in ply/yacc.py passes the file selected by yacc(picklefile=...) directly to pickle.load(), enabling reconstruction hooks to run during parser initialization. Exploitation requires control of the supplied file or its path; the CVE remains disputed because a published reproduction reports that the original proof of concept exits without creating its marker file.
Summary
What happened
Unsafe deserialization in PLY (Python Lex-Yacc) 3.11 allows context-dependent attackers to execute code through a crafted pickle file. LRTable.read_pickle() in ply/yacc.py passes the file selected by yacc(picklefile=...) directly to pickle.load(), enabling reconstruction hooks to run during parser initialization. Exploitation requires control of the supplied file or its path; the CVE remains disputed because a published reproduction reports that the original proof of concept exits without creating its marker file.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2025-56005
- Published
- Jan 20, 2026
- Updated
- Jan 20, 2026
- Vendor
- Unknown vendor
- Product
- Unknown product
- Classifications
- CWE-502
- Attack vector
- Unavailable
- Privileges
- Unavailable
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Jan 20, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Jan 20, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Affected products and versions are unavailable in this record.
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- Undocumented-RCE-in-PLY proof of conceptproof of concept · unverified
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo