Authorization bypass via incorrect userset optimization
Published Aug 18, 2025 · Updated Aug 18, 2025
Incorrect authorization in OpenFGA 1.9.3 through 1.9.4 allows remote authenticated users to obtain unauthorized downstream access. The LocalChecker.checkDirect path applies the weight-two resolver when multiple directly assignable usersets share a type, relying on object ID equality without checking the relation. Exposure requires a model with more than one same-type directly assignable userset, assigned userset tuples, and dependent Check or ListObjects queries.
Summary
What happened
Incorrect authorization in OpenFGA 1.9.3 through 1.9.4 allows remote authenticated users to obtain unauthorized downstream access. The LocalChecker.checkDirect path applies the weight-two resolver when multiple directly assignable usersets share a type, relying on object ID equality without checking the relation. Exposure requires a model with more than one same-type directly assignable userset, assigned userset tuples, and dependent Check or ListObjects queries.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2025-55213
- Published
- Aug 18, 2025
- Updated
- Aug 18, 2025
- Vendor
- OpenFGA
- Product
- OpenFGA
- Classifications
- CWE-863
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Aug 18, 2025CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Aug 18, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=>= 1.9.3, < 1.9.5
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo