Authenticated worker code execution via XCom interpolation
Published Apr 15, 2026 · Updated Apr 15, 2026
Code injection in Apache Airflow before 3.2.0 allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary code on workers through crafted XCom values. The example_xcom DAG inserted XComArg values directly into a BashOperator command, allowing stored shell syntax to alter the executed command. Exploitation requires UI permission to modify XComs and use of the non-production example or a copied pattern; releases without that pattern are not exposed.
Summary
What happened
Code injection in Apache Airflow before 3.2.0 allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary code on workers through crafted XCom values. The example_xcom DAG inserted XComArg values directly into a BashOperator command, allowing stored shell syntax to alter the executed command. Exploitation requires UI permission to modify XComs and use of the non-production example or a copied pattern; releases without that pattern are not exposed.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2025-54550
- Published
- Apr 15, 2026
- Updated
- Apr 15, 2026
- Vendor
- The Apache Software Foundation
- Product
- Apache Airflow
- Classifications
- CWE-94, T1059.004
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Apr 15, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Apr 15, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=0 <3.2.0
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo