Authenticated command execution through MCP calls
Published Jul 17, 2025 · Updated Jul 17, 2025
Code injection in the MCP call in 1Panel-dev MaxKB before 1.10.9-lts or 2.0.0 allows remote authenticated users to execute commands. The vendor discloses only that an MCP call triggers command execution and a rebound shell; it does not identify the faulty function or input operation. Low-privileged access, high-complexity conditions, and user interaction are required, after which the attacker obtains a server shell.
Summary
What happened
Code injection in the MCP call in 1Panel-dev MaxKB before 1.10.9-lts or 2.0.0 allows remote authenticated users to execute commands. The vendor discloses only that an MCP call triggers command execution and a rebound shell; it does not identify the faulty function or input operation. Low-privileged access, high-complexity conditions, and user interaction are required, after which the attacker obtains a server shell.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2025-53928
- Published
- Jul 17, 2025
- Updated
- Jul 17, 2025
- Vendor
- KubeOperator
- Product
- MaxKB
- Classifications
- CWE-94, T1059
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Jul 17, 2025CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Jul 17, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=< 1.10.9-lts
- Affected versionversion=< 2.0.0
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- Vendor advisory rebound-shell proof of conceptproof of concept · unverified
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo