Client-side script execution via reflected comment fields
Published Jul 16, 2025 · Updated Jul 16, 2025
Reflected XSS in emlog pro-2.5.17 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute script in a victim's browser through a forged comment. The unauthenticated addcom handler returns the comment and comname POST fields in browser-interpreted output without neutralizing script-related HTML. Exploitation requires persuading a victim to visit an attacker-controlled page that submits the forged POST request; the resulting script runs in the emlog site context.
Summary
What happened
Reflected XSS in emlog pro-2.5.17 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute script in a victim's browser through a forged comment. The unauthenticated addcom handler returns the comment and comname POST fields in browser-interpreted output without neutralizing script-related HTML. Exploitation requires persuading a victim to visit an attacker-controlled page that submits the forged POST request; the resulting script runs in the emlog site context.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2025-53926
- Published
- Jul 16, 2025
- Updated
- Jul 16, 2025
- Vendor
- emlog
- Product
- emlog
- Classifications
- CWE-79, CWE-80, T1189
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Jul 16, 2025CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Jul 16, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=<= pro-2.5.17
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- GHSA-g8jx-pj5p-fm3x cross-site request proof of conceptproof of concept · unverified
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo