Unauthenticated TMM crash via ILX call traffic
Published Oct 15, 2025 · Updated Oct 15, 2025
Buffer overflow in F5 BIG-IP affected releases allows remote attackers to crash TMM via traffic to an ILX::call iRule. F5 identifies CWE-120 in ILX::call processing but has not disclosed the copied buffer, input field, or missing length check. The crash is remotely triggerable without authentication only when a virtual server has an iRule that invokes ILX::call, interrupting traffic handled by the affected TMM.
Summary
What happened
Buffer overflow in F5 BIG-IP affected releases allows remote attackers to crash TMM via traffic to an ILX::call iRule. F5 identifies CWE-120 in ILX::call processing but has not disclosed the copied buffer, input field, or missing length check. The crash is remotely triggerable without authentication only when a virtual server has an iRule that invokes ILX::call, interrupting traffic handled by the affected TMM.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2025-53474
- Published
- Oct 15, 2025
- Updated
- Oct 15, 2025
- Vendor
- F5 Networks
- Product
- BIG-IP
- Classifications
- CWE-120, CAPEC-100, T1499.004
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Oct 15, 2025CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Oct 15, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=15.1.0 <15.1.10.8
- Affected versionversion=16.1.0 <16.1.6.1
- Affected versionversion=17.1.0 <17.1.3
- Affected versionversion=17.5.0 <17.5.1.3
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo