Code execution via unsanitized shell command arguments
Published Jul 8, 2025 · Updated Jul 9, 2025
Command injection in Flux159 MCP Server Kubernetes before 2.5.0 allows remote attackers to execute code through crafted tool arguments. The kubectl_scale and related tools interpolate client-controlled values into shell command strings passed to child_process.execSync without neutralizing shell metacharacters. Exploitation requires a vulnerable tool call, either directly or after an MCP client follows attacker-controlled instructions, and runs commands with the server process's privileges.
Summary
What happened
Command injection in Flux159 MCP Server Kubernetes before 2.5.0 allows remote attackers to execute code through crafted tool arguments. The kubectl_scale and related tools interpolate client-controlled values into shell command strings passed to child_process.execSync without neutralizing shell metacharacters. Exploitation requires a vulnerable tool call, either directly or after an MCP client follows attacker-controlled instructions, and runs commands with the server process's privileges.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2025-53355
- Published
- Jul 8, 2025
- Updated
- Jul 9, 2025
- Vendor
- Flux159
- Product
- MCP Server Kubernetes
- Classifications
- CWE-77, T1059.004
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Jul 8, 2025CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Jul 9, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=< 2.5.0
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- GHSA-gjv4-ghm7-q58q MCP tool command-injection proof of conceptproof of concept · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo