Unauthenticated runner command execution via discussion field interpolation
Published Jul 1, 2025 · Updated Jul 1, 2025
Command injection in Gluestack gluestack-ui before e6b4271 allows remote attackers to execute shell commands through GitHub Discussions. The discussion-to-slack workflow embeds discussion title, body, URL, author, and category values directly into an Ubuntu runner shell block without neutralizing command substitutions. Creating a discussion in a repository that retains the workflow reaches the unauthenticated path, enabling access to runner-held tokens and repository modification.
Summary
What happened
Command injection in Gluestack gluestack-ui before e6b4271 allows remote attackers to execute shell commands through GitHub Discussions. The discussion-to-slack workflow embeds discussion title, body, URL, author, and category values directly into an Ubuntu runner shell block without neutralizing command substitutions. Creating a discussion in a repository that retains the workflow reaches the unauthenticated path, enabling access to runner-held tokens and repository modification.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2025-53104
- Published
- Jul 1, 2025
- Updated
- Jul 1, 2025
- Vendor
- Gluestack
- Product
- gluestack-ui
- Classifications
- CWE-77, T1059.004
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Jul 1, 2025CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Jul 1, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=< e6b4271
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo