HTTP response manipulation via unsanitized header fields
Published Jun 27, 2025 · Updated Jun 27, 2025
CRLF injection in ESP32Async ESPAsyncWebServer 3.7.8 and earlier allows remote attackers to manipulate HTTP headers and responses. AsyncWebHeader splits a supplied header string at the first colon and serializes the resulting name and value without rejecting carriage returns or line feeds. Exploitation requires an application to pass attacker-controlled header data into this constructor; injected line breaks can add headers or split an HTTP response.
Summary
What happened
CRLF injection in ESP32Async ESPAsyncWebServer 3.7.8 and earlier allows remote attackers to manipulate HTTP headers and responses. AsyncWebHeader splits a supplied header string at the first colon and serializes the resulting name and value without rejecting carriage returns or line feeds. Exploitation requires an application to pass attacker-controlled header data into this constructor; injected line breaks can add headers or split an HTTP response.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2025-53094
- Published
- Jun 27, 2025
- Updated
- Jun 27, 2025
- Vendor
- ESP32Async
- Product
- ESPAsyncWebServer
- Classifications
- CWE-113, CWE-93, T1190
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Jun 27, 2025CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Jun 27, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=<= 3.7.8
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- GHSA CRLF header-injection exampleproof of concept · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo