Web-shell upload via forged administrator request
Published Dec 30, 2025 · Updated Dec 30, 2025
CSRF in ConoHa by GMO WING Website Migrator 1.2.0 and earlier allows remote attackers to upload a web shell via forged requests. An affected function accepts a state-changing request without correct WordPress nonce validation; published records do not name the function or parameter. Exploitation requires an authenticated site administrator to open an attacker-controlled link or page, after which the uploaded shell enables server-side code execution.
Summary
What happened
CSRF in ConoHa by GMO WING Website Migrator 1.2.0 and earlier allows remote attackers to upload a web shell via forged requests. An affected function accepts a state-changing request without correct WordPress nonce validation; published records do not name the function or parameter. Exploitation requires an authenticated site administrator to open an attacker-controlled link or page, after which the uploaded shell enables server-side code execution.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2025-52835
- Published
- Dec 30, 2025
- Updated
- Dec 30, 2025
- Vendor
- GMO Internet Group, Inc.
- Product
- WING Website Migrator
- Classifications
- CWE-352, CAPEC-650, T1204.001
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Dec 30, 2025CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Dec 30, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=n/a <=1.1.9
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo