Stored XSS via forged administrator request
Published Jun 20, 2025 · Updated May 12, 2026
CSRF in Mohammad Parsa Logo Manager For Samandehi 0.5 and earlier allows remote attackers to store malicious script via forged admin requests. The affected function omits or misapplies WordPress nonce validation, so a cross-origin request carrying attacker-controlled input reaches the stored-XSS operation. Exploitation requires an authenticated administrator to visit attacker-controlled content; the stored script then executes when the injected value is rendered.
Summary
What happened
CSRF in Mohammad Parsa Logo Manager For Samandehi 0.5 and earlier allows remote attackers to store malicious script via forged admin requests. The affected function omits or misapplies WordPress nonce validation, so a cross-origin request carrying attacker-controlled input reaches the stored-XSS operation. Exploitation requires an authenticated administrator to visit attacker-controlled content; the stored script then executes when the injected value is rendered.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2025-52780
- Published
- Jun 20, 2025
- Updated
- May 12, 2026
- Vendor
- Mohammad Parsa
- Product
- Logo Manager For Samandehi
- Classifications
- CWE-352, CAPEC-62
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Jun 20, 2025CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- May 12, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=0 <=0.5
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo